Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
bpNichol's poetry has attracted attention from literary critics who want to understand the methods used in its creation. His poems often combine traditional poetics with mathematical principles that are a challenge to analyze or repeat. In particular, his poems from Probable Systems contain mathematical games called alphametrics and cryptarithms. Mathematics provide a new way of reading these poems and challenge assumptions of existing literary criticism. In this study, four and five letter words are examined with alpha-metrics. The two alphametrics used are: 1) the ordinal value of the word, and 2) those of the form A + B = C which are known as additive alphametrics. The ordinal values are plotted for the five letter words and are shown to conform to the normal distribution. An exhaustive search technique is used to solve additive alphametrics and gives the enumeration of the first one hundred five letter alphametrics with unique solutions. Their use in poetry is speculated upon and connected back to the works of bpNichol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it