MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2540816348 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1991.259300

Locally adaptive space variant restoration of CT images

2002· article· en· W2540816348 on OpenAlexaff
S Rathee, Z.J. Koles, T.R. Overton

Bibliographic record

VenueConference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage restorationPoint spread functionIterative reconstructionPixelComputer scienceComputer visionNoise (video)AlgorithmImage resolutionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. An iterative algorithm for space variant image restoration was applied to computed tomographic (CT) images for improving spatial resolution compromised due to the finite size of the X-ray beam profiles. A prewhitening filter is designed from the noise power spectrum to uncorrelate the noise in the image. The restoration problem is formulated as a maximum-likelihood solution regularized with the weighted image norm. The nonstationary variance of the noise at each pixel location is utilized to locally regulate the smoothness or sharpness of the restored images. Unlike previous space variant restoration methods, this restoration procedure is carried out in a Cartesian coordinate system. Therefore, the symmetries in the spatial variations of the point spread function (PSF) are utilized to develop an efficient storage scheme which requires 0.75 megawords of memory for a 256*256 image, and a 9*9 PSF. This makes the computation of the reblurring process as fast as for a space invariant PSF.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging ConferenceSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207