MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Paleoecology of a groundwater outflow using siliceous microfossils

2001· article· en· W2540823162 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Euan D. Reavie, Marianne S. V. Douglas, Nancy E. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiatomPaleolimnologyGeologyPaleoecologySedimentWater columnCrater lakeDeposition (geology)MacrophyteEcologyOceanographyPaleontologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paleoecological investigations of sediments deposited downstream of freshwater springs have the potential to reconstruct the environmental history of source aquifers and their catchments, thereby allowing for the study of long-term changes in these important hydrological systems. In an exploratory investigation, a 76-cm sediment column was obtained from a spring bed in Scarborough, southern Ontario, Canada. The column represents about 160 years of accumulated sediment. Siliceous microfossils, including diatoms, chrysophyte cysts, phytoliths and plates of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda), were identified and enumerated. Over the ~160-year period, siliceous remains track a gradual transition from a slow river environment in the early 1800s to a spring-fed pond environment by the late-1800s, hurricane-induced flooding, and the eventual slowing and drying of the spring in the latter half of the twentieth century. Basal, pre-settlement sediments contain a cosmopolitan assemblage of diatom taxa and testacean plates of the genus Lesquereusia. Between ~1880 and ~1954, fossils of aquatic species occur only in trace amounts, indicating increased deposition of clastic material and poor conditions for survival, but unbroken microfossils indicate that preservation of opaline remains was not a problem. Despite low concentrations of microfossils in this interval, chrysophyte and testacean survival was favoured over diatoms. In 1954, a thick layer of sediment was deposited by hurricane-induced flooding, confirmed by high phytolith concentrations from terrestrial sources. Since ~1960, epiphytic diatoms, reflecting dense macrophyte growth and higher productivity, dominate the diatom assemblage. Some of the recent diatom taxa are also salinity-tolerant, reflecting possible groundwater salinification. Chrysophyte cysts are relatively abundant at the top of the sediment column, but recent concentrations are lower than pre-settlement levels, likely reflecting an increased nutrient load. Recent increases in vegetation in and around the spring are also inferred by high concentrations of testacean plates and phytoliths. These paleoecological data match historical records and data from previous investigations of fossil aquatic insect larvae. These approaches show promise for relating changes in siliceous microfossils to human impacts and natural changes in spring habitats, their catchments and the quality of groundwater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoscienceSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207