MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Patterns in consumption of woody plants by snowshoe hares in the northwestern United States

2002· article· en· W2540995932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aaron J. Wirsing, Dennis L. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWashington State University
KeywordsSnowshoe harePer capitaPopulationBiomass (ecology)BiologyAbundance (ecology)EcologyRange (aeronautics)Economic shortageNutrientGeographyAgronomyPredationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herbivores manifesting spatially variable population densities may elicit geographical differences in the characteristics of the plants upon which they feed. Northern snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) populations undergo dramatic numerical cycles; during periods of hare abundance, browsing by these populations can result in both absolute food shortage and the production of chemical defenses among browsed plants. Southern hare populations never achieve the densities characteristic of their northern counterparts and, therefore, should be less likely to elicit either food biomass limitation or the production of plant chemical defenses. Thus, hares in these populations should have access to a superabundant food supply and select browse species according to their nutrient content rather than their defensive chemical composition. We measured the extent of browse use by hares in the southwestern portion of the species’ range by calculating per capita winter browse availability (total biomass of potential food divided by winter hare population estimate) on six study sites during the winter of 1999. In addition, we used feeding trials on captive hares to determine patterns of browse consumption. Per capita browse biomass estimates were adequate to support the hares residing on each study site; on average, a 10-fold numerical increase would have been required to produce absolute food shortage. Patterns in consumption of browse by hares were not related to concentrations of plant chemical defenses (total phenols and monoterpenes), but rather to crude protein content. Levels of protein and copper (and possibly selenium) in the major browse species in our area were low, implying that, despite having access to a superabundance of poorly defended food, hares in southwestern populations may be subject to a poor-quality diet. In support of this possibility, we found that free-ranging hares had reproductive rates (potential natality = 5.64 young female-1 year-1) that were qualitatively lower than any reported in the literature (n = 18 studies) and males had relatively poor overwinter condition as well as delayed testes recrudescence. Poor diet quality and, consequently, low reproductive rates may contribute to the allegedly non-cyclic and generally lower densities of southwestern hare populations.Keywords: snowshoe hare, Lepus americanus, browse availability, plant chemical defenses, browse consumption patterns, reproductive rates, protein, copper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoscienceSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207