MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541078569

FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEBERHASILAN IMPLEMENTASI SIAPADA PNPN UPK MANDIRI

2015· article· id· W2541078569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Competitive Advantage · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccounting information systemQuality (philosophy)Affect (linguistics)Information systemPerceptionInformation qualityUser satisfactionComputer scienceVariety (cybernetics)Structural equation modelingKnowledge managementBusinessAccountingPsychologyEngineeringHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research is motivated by the importance of accounting information system in micro-finance institutions which UPK PNPM Mandiri which has an important role as a catalyst for poverty alleviation. Various data and field observations indicate that the accounting information system of various UPK PNPM Mandiri has not shown reliable system performance and relevant quality, even accounting standards have not been fully implemented. This research adapt DeLone and McLean model that has been modified McGill et al (2003) to map and design a critical component of the successful implementation of accounting information systems for individual users as well as analyzing a variety of system variables on user satisfaction, and the impact on individual performance. The hypothesis was analyzed using Structural Equation Model (SEM) with the help of software SmartPLS 2.0M3. Results of this research is the quality system affect the perceived quality of the system. The perception of the quality system has no effect on end-user satisfaction. The quality of information influence on end-user satisfaction. End-user satisfaction effect on system usage. The quality of the information does not affect the use of the system. The perception of the quality system does not affect the use of the system. Keywords : QIS, AIS, DeLone and McLeon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it