MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541305562

PROPUESTA DE UN PLAN DE EXPORTACIÓN DE HONGO DESHIDRATADO BOLETUS LUTEUS CON DESTINO A LANGUEDOC ROUSSILLON-FRANCIA, PARA INCREMENTAR LA COMPETITIVIDAD DE LA ASOCIACIÓN SAN ISIDRO LABRADOR DEL DISTRITO DE INCAHUASI, EN EL AÑO 2015.

2016· article· es· W2541305562 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anais Fiorela Vallejos Lucumi, Vidiksa Llaguento Cajo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Production Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente investigacion titulada “Propuesta de un plan de exportacion de hongo deshidratado Boletus Luteus con destino a Languedoc Roussillon-Francia incrementara la competitividad de la asociacion San Isidro Labrador del distrito de Incahuasi en el ano 2015”. Siendo este su generador de ingresos. Pero ?En que medida una propuesta de plan de exportacion de hongo deshidratado Boletus Luteus con destino a Languedoc Roussillon-Francia incrementara la competitividad de la Asociacion San Isidro Labrador del distrito de Incahuasi en el ano 2015? Este trabajo tiene como objetivo principal el proponer un plan de exportacion del hongo deshidratado Boletus Luteus. A traves de un diagnostico del estado actual de la produccion del hongo deshidratado, Un analisis del reglamento de la Union Europea. El presente estudio corresponde a una investigacion cualitativa. Y Para la cual se llevara a cabo Guias de observacion aplicables al proceso productivo, Entrevistas a los expertos del tema como entidades y a las personas administrativas encargadas de la Asociacion San Isidro Labrador. EL Valor Presento Neto (VPN) es positivo de S/.276,042.91, y la Tasa Interna de Retorno (TIR) del proyecto es de 31%, siendo la TIR mayor al rendimiento requerido, el proyecto resulta ser muy factible y rentable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgricultural and Food Production StudiesFrench-language works237,207