Rare Case of Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Vulva: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aggressive Angiomyxoma (AA) is a rare locally aggressive soft tissue tumor with high chance of local recurrence occuring in young women of reproductive age group. These neoplasms are characterized by a mixture of spindle or stellate cells in a loosely myxoid stroma with prominent vascular component containing large, thickwalled blood vessels. A 35 year old multiparous lady presented with right vulval swelling which was rapidly progressing in size. Local examination revealed a soft fleshy mass occupying whole of the right labia majora. In view of the rapidly enlarging lesion over a short duration, we suspected a soft tissue neoplasm and preceded with wide local excision of the mass with adequate margins in all dimensions, eventhough we did not have a preoperative tissue diagnosis. To our surprise, final histopathology was Aggressive Angiomyxoma (AA). The treatment of choice for Aggressive Angiomyxoma is wide local excision with negative margins and the same was done in our case. Recurrence of the tumor may be avoided by wide local excision with adequate margins. It is possibly a hormonally responsive neoplasm. Treatment with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone is an emerging therapy.Overall prognosis of AA is good.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".