Dietary nitrate supplementation and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endothelial dysfunction and reduced nitric oxide (NO) signaling are key abnormalities leading to skeletal muscle oxygen delivery-utilization mismatch and poor physical capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Oral inorganic nitrate supplementation provides an exogenous source of NO that may enhance locomotor muscle function and oxygenation with consequent improvement in exercise tolerance in HFrEF. Thirteen patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized crossover study to receive concentrated nitrate-rich (nitrate) or nitrate-depleted (placebo) beetroot juice for 9 days. Low- and high-intensity constant-load cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed with noninvasive measurements of central hemodynamics (stroke volume, heart rate, and cardiac output via impedance cardiography), arterial blood pressure, pulmonary oxygen uptake, quadriceps muscle oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy), and blood lactate concentration. Ten patients completed the study with no adverse clinical effects. Nitrate-rich supplementation resulted in significantly higher plasma nitrite concentration compared with placebo (240 ± 48 vs. 56 ± 8 nM, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of time to exercise intolerance between nitrate and placebo (495 ± 53 vs. 489 ± 58 s, respectively; P > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in central hemodynamics, arterial blood pressure, pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics, skeletal muscle oxygenation, or blood lactate concentration from rest to low- or high-intensity exercise between conditions. Oral inorganic nitrate supplementation with concentrated beetroot juice did not present with beneficial effects on central or peripheral components of the oxygen transport pathway thereby failing to improve exercise tolerance in patients with moderate HFrEF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".