MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541577704 · doi:10.5376/cge.2016.04.0002

Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes and Prognostic Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Based on RNA-Seq and KEGG Pathway Network

2016· article· en· W2541577704 on OpenAlex
S.M. Zhang, Yunyan Gu, Shang-Jung Wu, Yu Kang, Si Yi Liu, D. Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Genetics and Epigenetics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKEGGIdentification (biology)Breast cancerComputational biologyGeneRNA-SeqBiologyRNACancerBioinformaticsGene expressionTranscriptomeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incidence of breast cancer is a complex biological process and multiple genes involved in the regulation. The gene expression differences of tumor cells between different patients’ determine the different treatment and prognosis. Therefore investigate the characteristics changes of breast cancer from a genetic level include identification of differentially expressed genes and prognostic markers will facilitate the development of appropriate and effective treatment. This subject obtained RNA-Seq Level 3 gene expression data from TCGA database, SAM algorithm was used to find differentially expressed genes. Next, the DAVID bioinformatics tool was employed to analyze the function of these genes, and obtained the significantly enriched pathways of these genes. Then gene interaction information was extracted from the pathways, KEGG pathway network was built by integrating these information, and the network topology were analyzed. The hub nodes extracted from the network were as candidate genes. Then the genes which have a significant impact on the survival were identified by using Cox proportional hazards regression model. And these genes were introduced into a multivariate analysis, the sample risk scores were calculated, according to which samples were divided into a high risk group and a low risk group. The survival difference between these two groups was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method, and logrank test was used to assess the statistical significant. By analyzing the gene expression dataset of TCGA database, a total of 5880 differentially expressed genes were found. Eight significant pathways were obtained by enrichment analysis. Then we used the interaction information of genes extracted from the pathways to build a KEGG pathway network, and 32 candidate genes were obtained from the network. Three significant genes (AARS, ADK, and ADORA2A) which have significant impact on the prognosis of breast cancer were identified by Cox proportional hazards. These three genes can be used as new prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer, provide guidance for the treatment of breast cancer. Wherein AARS has been proven associated with breast cancer risk. By multivariate analysis, this subject divided breast cancer into a high risk group and a low risk group, and there exits significant difference between them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it