MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541736563 · doi:10.1109/ias.1998.732321

Intelligent speed control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motors

2002· article· en· W2541736563 on OpenAlexaff
M.A. Rahman, M. Nasir Uddin, T.S. Radwan, Md. Azizul Hoque

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronic speed controlComputer scienceController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkRotor (electric)MagnetDC motorControl engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise control of the permanent magnet synchronous motor over wide speed range is an engineering challenge. This paper considers the design and implementation of two novel techniques of speed control for an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor using hybrid current and artificial neural network controllers. The intelligent hybrid controller which is a combination of the hysteresis current controller for high speed operation and a ramp comparator for low speed operation is proposed. The switching between the two modes is conveniently enabled in software. This hybrid method is compared with the artificial neural network based speed control scheme incorporating the on-line weights and biases updating as well as adaptive learning rate features in software command. Systematic mathematical formulations are given. An implementation schematic using the digital signal processor board DS1102 is presented. Complete control systems have been implemented using current-controlled three-phase PWM voltage source inverter for a laboratory 1 hp interior rotor permanent magnet motor. The experimental results validate the theoretically simulated speed responses under different dynamic operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207