MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542514176 · doi:10.1109/emap.2012.6507921

Packaging of SiC-SBD for high temperature operation

2012· preprint· en· W2542514176 on OpenAlexaff
Zarel Valdez‐Nava, Masahiro Kozako, Sorin Dinculescu, Ichiro Omura, Masayuki Hikita, Thierry Lebey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSchottky diodeDiodeRectificationOptoelectronicsPower electronicsSilicon carbideInterconnectionWide-bandgap semiconductorVoltageElectronicsHigh voltageElectrical engineeringAtmospheric temperature rangeEngineering physicsComposite materialComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using wideband gap semiconductors (SiC, GaN) appears as possible solution to the growing demand for the development of high temperature, high frequencies power electronics. This will help downsizing the current Power Electronics systems and extend their range of operation conditions. The aim of this paper is to present the results obtained concerning the packaging of a full-wave rectifying bridge using SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes, capable to operate above 300°C. The diodes are rated 1200 V and 50 A. The proposed packaging is based on an insulating-gas encapsulation and stacking of the components. The rectifying function was tested by feeding a current trough the bridge at room temperature, and while applying high voltage in an insulating gas-filled heated chamber. Results show that the type of interconnection proposed can withstand at least 10 A and 200 V in rectifying conditions. Gas encapsulation allowed for an operation of the diodes under high voltage conditions up to 350°C even if at this temperature diode leakage current is too high to perform an appropriate rectification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207