MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542922882 · doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2016.10.008

Patient Engagement in Research and Innovation: A New Framework

2016· editorial· en· W2542922882 on OpenAlexaff
Arlinda Ruco, Kathryn Nichol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2016
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPublic Health OntarioSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction planHealthcare systemPlan (archaeology)Health careAction (physics)Health planPsychologyMedicineMedical educationPolitical scienceGeographyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.114
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.114
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.023
Scholarly communication0.0360.025
Open science0.0090.010
Research integrity0.0800.088
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.314
GPT teacher head0.572
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of medical imaging and radiation sciencesSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207