Automatic Vehicle Detection and Driver Identification Framework for Secure Vehicle Parking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent times, automatic face recognition algorithms are playing a key role in several security applications. In this paper, we develop a framework for enhancing the security of vehicle parking spaces. The proposed framework can be divided in to three separate steps. In first step, a vehicle in the input image is spotted. In second step, driver face is located. In final step, a robust face recognition algorithm identifies the driver by comparing the face image with face images in a database. On successful identification of the driver face, vehicle is allowed to enter in parking area. To detect vehicle and face(s), we use Adaptive Boosting algorithm and Haar-like features, while driver face identification algorithm uses Eigenfaces for feature selection and Euclidian distance for classification. To test the face identification, we simulate a challenging situation where only a single facial image of a driver is available in the database and four face images in different poses are used for testing. Simulation results show very high detection and identification results regardless of the facial pose variation. The results demonstrate the feasibility of developed framework to be deployed in any public vehicle parking area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it