MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2543591043

245. TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR BY IMPLANTS WITH MULTIDIRECTIONAL LOCKING SCREWS

2011· article· en· W2543591043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Noureddine Bahri, Hector Cabreras-Palacios, Martin Wurm, Maximilian Faschingbauer, Arndt‐Peter Schulz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriprostheticMedicineProsthesisImplantFemurFixation (population genetics)SurgeryCrutchDentistryOrthodonticsArthroplastyPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose of the study: Implants with multidirectional locking screws theoretically have many advantages for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. In the event of osteoporotic bone, this system of plate fixation ensures stability and better bone fixation. Using screws anchored in the different angles, we proposed rigid fixation around the prosthesis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of outcomes obtained after treatment of perprosthetic femoral fractures, Vancouver B1 and C, comparing two types of implants with angular stability (straight plate and folded plate). Material and methods: From June 1999 to December 2007, we treated 58 patients with periprothetic fractures of the femur using locking plates. Mean age was 72.4 years, 40 patients were female. Thirty-two patients (55.2%) had a total hip prosthesis, 21 a total knee prosthesis and 5 both types of prosthesis (8.6%). We noted: peri- and postoperative complications, degree of bone healing, degree of mobility (Barthel Mobility index and stand up and go test) as well as the social status of the patients. Results: Bone healing was obtained in 56 cases (96.5%). In two patients, the implant was dislocated and in four others there were general complications. The mean time necessary to obtain total weight-bearing two-leg stance was 8.6 weeks. Forty-six patients (78%) had the same social status as before the fracture. For mobility, 52 patients (89%) achieved the same level as before fracture. Four other patients required a crutch for walking and two needed a walker. Mean Barthel index was 85 points (max 100) and improved 35 points at onset of rehabilitation. Mean stand up and go was 22 s. Conclusion: According to the review of the literature, 35% of plates dislocate after osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures. In our study, the rate was 3.5%, with 7% general complications. We can thus conclude that the methods presented here enable good bone healing in the majority of cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty→French-language works237,207→