π-Extended fluoranthene imide derivatives: synthesis, structures, and electronic and optical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diels–Alder reactions of acenaphthylene-5,6-dicarboximide (AI) derivatives with the corresponding dienes afforded some derivatives of π-extended fluoranthene imide, namely N-(2-ethylhexyl)-7,10-diphenylfluoranthene imide (DPFI) and N-(2-ethylhexyl)-7,8,9,10-tetraphenylfluoranthene imide (TPFI), N-(n-octyl)-benzo[k]fluoranthene imide (BFI), and N-(n-octyl)-naphtho[k]fluoranthene imide (NFI). Molecular structures of TPFI and BFI reveal that the core π-skeletons have a highly planar structure, and the molecules form a dimeric structure in the crystals. The absorption spectra exhibit bathochromic shift with π-extension of the core π-skeletons. On the other hand, DPFI and TPFI show the long-wavelength emission related to BFI, probably due to π-extension toward the phenyl substituents in the excited states. BFI and NFI exhibited an interesting concentration-dependent 1 H-NMR behavior in CDCl 3 , suggesting self-aggregation formation. Moreover, BFI and NFI show moderate and remarkable solvatofluorochromism in solutions (BFI for Δλ EM = 67 nm, NFI for Δλ EM = 116 nm), respectively, while DPFI and TPFI show weak solvatofluorochromism. The density functional theory calculations demonstrate that the considerable spatial separation between the HOMO and LUMO coefficients in the NFI molecule. The result indicates that the ground-to-excited state transition of NFI should have intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".