π-Extended fluoranthene imide derivatives: synthesis, structures, and electronic and optical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diels–Alder reactions of acenaphthylene-5,6-dicarboximide (AI) derivatives with the corresponding dienes afforded some derivatives of π-extended fluoranthene imide, namely N-(2-ethylhexyl)-7,10-diphenylfluoranthene imide (DPFI) and N-(2-ethylhexyl)-7,8,9,10-tetraphenylfluoranthene imide (TPFI), N-(n-octyl)-benzo[k]fluoranthene imide (BFI), and N-(n-octyl)-naphtho[k]fluoranthene imide (NFI). Molecular structures of TPFI and BFI reveal that the core π-skeletons have a highly planar structure, and the molecules form a dimeric structure in the crystals. The absorption spectra exhibit bathochromic shift with π-extension of the core π-skeletons. On the other hand, DPFI and TPFI show the long-wavelength emission related to BFI, probably due to π-extension toward the phenyl substituents in the excited states. BFI and NFI exhibited an interesting concentration-dependent 1H-NMR behavior in CDCl3, suggesting self-aggregation formation. Moreover, BFI and NFI show moderate and remarkable solvatofluorochromism in solutions (BFI for ΔλEM = 67 nm, NFI for ΔλEM = 116 nm), respectively, while DPFI and TPFI show weak solvatofluorochromism. The density functional theory calculations demonstrate that the considerable spatial separation between the HOMO and LUMO coefficients in the NFI molecule. The result indicates that the ground-to-excited state transition of NFI should have intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".