MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545645658 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2016-0505

Probing the structural features that influence the mesomorphic properties of substituted dibenz[<i>a</i>,<i>c</i>]anthracenes

2016· article· en· W2545645658 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Joseph A. Paquette, Katie M. Psutka, Colin J. Yardley, Kenneth E. Maly

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersUniversité de MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWilfrid Laurier University
KeywordsMesophaseChemistryIntermolecular forceCrystallographyTriphenyleneYield (engineering)StereochemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculePhase (matter)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis and mesophase characterization of a series of novel hexaalkoxydibenzanthracenes to probe the effect of side-chain length variation and substituents on the mesophase temperature range. A series of hexaalkoxydibenz[a,c]anthracenes (2a–2i) with varying chain lengths were prepared by Suzuki coupling of the appropriate boronate ester with the corresponding dialkoxydibromonaphthalenes, followed by oxidative cyclization. Compounds 2a–2i were also brominated in the 10 and 13 positions to yield the corresponding dibromo series, 4a–4i. While none of the compounds, 2a–2i, exhibited columnar mesophases, all of the compounds in series 4a–4i did exhibit columnar phases over broad temperature ranges. To further investigate the effect of substituents on the mesomorphic properties of hexaalkoxydibenzanthracenes, we also prepared iodo-substituted 8, nitro-substituted 9, and amino-substituted 10. A comparison of the mesophase temperature range with previously reported compounds 3–7 shows that electron-withdrawing groups promote the formation of stable mesophases. However, our results also suggest that the substituents affect mesophase stability by participating in intermolecular contacts within the columnar stacks of the mesophase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207