MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Growth response of ponderosa pine (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i>) to climate in the eastern Cascade Mountains, Washington, U.S.A.: Implications for climatic change<sup>1</sup>

2002· article· en· W2545838935 on OpenAlex
Elizabeth Kusnierczyk, Gregory J. Ettl

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationClimate changeGrowing seasonEnvironmental scienceNutrientPinus <genus>SnowpackEcologyPhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyGeographyBiologySnowBotanyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractClimatic change is expected to cause dramatic shifts in low-elevation treeline in mountainous environments. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) were sampled across an elevation gradient adjacent to the Methow Valley of the Okanogan National Forest in the eastern Cascades, Washington to examine the potential response of ponderosa pine to climatic change. Response function analyses were used to compare climate-growth relationships among 12 sites, four elevations on three different mountains. Response function analysis attributes 42-55% of the inter-annual variation in growth to climate. Growth is positively correlated with November precipitation prior to the growing season on all 12 sites, suggesting that November precipitation is critical for increased root growth, increased nutrient availability through decomposition, building snowpack, or non-growing season photosynthesis and carbon storage. Growth is positively correlated with previous October, January, June, and July precipitation at more than one site. Temperature is not correlated with growth on any sites. Climate models predict that the Pacific Northwest will experience warmer and wetter winters and drier summers in the future. Growth-climate correlations suggest that the short-term growth response of ponderosa pine is most sensitive to non-growing season precipitation. Therefore, predicting ponderosa pine's response to projected climatic change is problematic, with wetter falls increasing growth and drier summers decreasing growth. Our results indicate that ponderosa pine is much more sensitive to precipitation than temperature and that any predictions of this arid species' response to climatic change are difficult, due to uncertainty in predicting future precipitation patterns.RésuméOn présume que les changements climatiques provoqueront des mouvements importants de la limite des arbres dans les régions montagneuses. Pour vérifier quelles pourraient être les répercussions de ces changements sur le pin pondérosa (Pinus ponderosa), nous avons échantillonné plusieurs individus le long d'un gradient altitudinal près de la vallée Methow, dans la forêt nationale Okanogan (eastern Cascades, Washington). Nous avons utilisé une analyse des fonctions de réponse pour comparer les relations entre le climat et la croissance des arbres dans 12 sites répartis selon quatre altitudes sur trois montagnes différentes. L'analyse des fonctions de réponse attribue au climat de 42 à 55 % des variations interannuelles de la croissance. Cette dernière est corrélée de façon positive avec les précipitations du mois de novembre précédant la saison de croissance dans tous les sites à l'étude. Cela suggère que les précipitations de novembre sont très importantes pour la croissance des racines, pour augmenter la disponibilité des éléments nutritifs par le biais de la décomposition, pour former le couvert de neige ou pour la photosynthèse hivernale et l'entreposage du carbone. La croissance d'une saison donnée est corrélée de façon positive avec les précipitations des mois d'octobre, janvier, juin et juillet de l'année précédente dans plus d'un site. On ne trouve aucune corrélation entre la température et la croissance. Les modèles climatiques prédisent que le Nord-Ouest du Pacifique subira des hivers plus chauds et humides et des étés plus secs dans l'avenir. Or, nos travaux suggèrent que la croissance du pin pondérosa est surtout influencée par les précipitations qui tombent hors de la saison de croissance. En conséquence, il est difficile de prédire la réponse du pin pondérosa aux changements climatiques prévus : les automnes humides favoriseront une meilleure croissance, alors que les étés secs auront l'effet contraire. D'autre part, nos résultats indiquent que le pin pondérosa est beaucoup plus sensible aux précipitations qu'aux températures. Toute prédiction relative à la croissance future de cette espèce des régions arides est donc problématique en raison des incertitudes des modèles climatiques quant au devenir des précipitations.Key Words: ponderosa pinedendrochronologyclimatic changeMots-clés: pin pondérosadendrochronologiechangement climatique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it