The Role of Public Institutions in the Governance of Small Firm Clusters in France/Le Role Des Institutions Publiques Dans la Gouvernance Des Poles De Competitivite De PME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Research on Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) clusters highlights the key role of in compensating for their lack of resources, especially in terms of coordination. However, modes and actors of are not specified. If the approach in terms of territorial, or local, partly fills this void, it remains insufficient to specify the role of public institutions involved. In the particular case of French cluster policy, it is possible to observe a profound change of public intervention modes. Our goal is to enrich the analysis of public action in by explicitly integrating the type of public institutions according to their level of intervention (local, regional, national) and the nature of their involvement. The originality of our analytical framework is based on the introduction of these two dimensions, which makes it possible to render operational the notion of territorial governance and its various modes (private, public, mixed). A comparative study was conducted on two French clusters mainly composed of SMEs located in the Rhone-Alps region. The first cluster is active in high added value mechanical industries (Arve-Industries); the second one operates in image, videogames and multimedia industries (Imaginove). The results show the key role that public institutions can play either as internal stakeholders or as external ones (i.e. outside of the structure). In both cases, there is a mixed mode of orchestrated by public and private actors. This mixing can be discussed from a perspective that focuses on the nature of the public institutions involved, as well as the degree of their involvement. This involvement is not so much due to the strong presence of SMEs but rather to the specific cluster configuration, which is linked to its historic and roots. One extension of our results points to the fact that a strong involvement of public institutions can lead to difficulties in managing the tension between the local anchorage and the openness that is necessary for innovation. Our results have strong implications for national public policies, particularly in matters concerning support to innovation and regional clusters. More specifically, they lead to calls for greater flexibility on behalf of central States (including Canadian provinces) in the co-construction of public policies that take into account and regional specificities. Resume La litterature sur les agglomerations de Petites et Moyennes Entreprises (PME) met en avant le role cle de la gouvernance pour pallier leur manque de ressources, notamment en matiere de coordination. Cependant, les modes et les acteurs de cette gouvernance ne sont pas precises. Si l'approche de la gouvernance >, ou >, comble en partie ce vide, elle s'avere insuffisante pour specifier le role des institutions publiques impliquees. Or, la politique francaise des poles implique une modification profonde des modes d'intervention publique. Notre objectif est d'enrichir l'analyse de l'action publique dans la gouvernance territoriale en integrant explicitement le type d'institutions publiques selon leur echelle d'intervention (locale, regionale, nationale) et la nature de leur implication. L'originalite de notre cadre d'analyse est base sur l'introduction de ces deux dimensions, qui permettent d'operationnaliser la notion de > et ses differents modes (privee, publique, mixte). Une etude comparative a ete menee sur deux poles de competitivite francais a forte dominante PME, tous deux situes en region Rhone-Alpes, l'un actif dans les industries mecaniques a forte valeur ajoutee (Arve-Industries), l'autre dans les industries de l'image (Imaginove). Les resultats mettent en avant le role cle que peuvent jouer les institutions publiques, qu'elles soient parties prenantes internes ou externes (i. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".