MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546726430

基于Kernel-ICA和X-ray成像的品种分类研究

2016· article· zh· W2546726430 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
韩仲志, 万剑华

Bibliographic record

Venue中国粮油学报 · 2016
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKernel (algebra)Artificial intelligenceIndependent component analysisMathematicsComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Combinatorics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

对农作物品种正确分类是作物分类学的重要内容,为考察X—ray成像技术对小麦品种分类研究的有效性,基于软X—ray成像仪采集的3品种(Kama,Rosaand Canadian)每个品种70个籽粒,共210个籽粒样本的x—ray扫描图像,并针对其7个形态几何特征(面积、周长、紧致度、籽粒长度、宽度、偏斜度、种子腹沟长度),提出了一种使用Kernel—ICA的方法先对特征进行优化,再进行小麦品种的聚类与识别的方法,并与K—means、C—means2种聚类方法以及基于工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量机(SVM)2种识别方法的分类结果进行比较,结果发现:分类正确率从高到低分别为:Kernel—ICA、SVM、C—means、K—means、BP—ANN,分类正确率分别为:91.9%、90.5%、89.5%、87.1%、86.9%。研究提出的Kernel—ICA的方法,聚类优化和识别能力较强,对软X—ray成像的小麦品种进行分类,已基本上满足农艺上对小麦品种分类需要,对农作物种质资源鉴别和作物品种分类研究具有积极意义。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中国粮油学报Same topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207