MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546734343 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005053

The Art of Writing and Implementing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Laboratories in Low-Resource Settings: Review of Guidelines and Best Practices

2016· review· en· W2546734343 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Barbé, Kristien Verdonck, Déby Mukendi, Veerle Lejon, Jean-Roger Lilo Kalo, Emilie Alirol, Philippe Gillet, Ninon S. Horié, Raffaella Ravinetto, Emmanuel Bottieau, Cédric P. Yansouni, Andrea Sylvia Winkler, Harry van Loen, Marleen Boelaert, Pascal Lutumba, Jan Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsBest practiceResource (disambiguation)Standard operating procedureComputer scienceMedicineManagement scienceEngineering managementMedical educationProcess managementEngineeringOperations managementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The Art of Writing and Implementing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Laboratories in Low-Resource Settings: Review of Guidelines and Best Practices</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.384
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.384
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.283
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS neglected tropical diseasesSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207