MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546871223 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726655

Cascaded particle filter for real-time tracking using RGB-D sensor

2016· article· en· W2546871223 on OpenAlexaff
Xuhong Liu, Shahram Payandeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTracking (education)Minimum bounding boxComputer scienceRGB color modelFilter (signal processing)Tracking systemImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a real-time human body tracking system based on cascaded particle filter using Microsoft Kinect. Our tracking is performed in two layers: RGB image-based 2D region body tracking and 1D depth image body extremities tracking. These two layers are combined to represent the basis for full 3D human body tracking by obtaining a probable human body bounding box in 2D while 3D position is obtained by incorporating available depth information. As the first layer, we utilized motion history for tracking a walking person. One particle filter is used to track the 3D bounding box of the person in synchronization with RGB and depth video stream. For this layer, we utilized the expected motion constraints for enhancing the distribution of particle in importance sampling stage. For the second layer within the bounding box, we use depth information to track the extremities. State of the points of extremities is defined and another particle filter is implemented which utilizes a measure using the notion of spin image. The proposed framework can be used to evaluate and compare estimates at any given instances. For example, the initial estimates associated with the tracking of the whole body can be used as a coarse measure for the tracking of the local extremities in case of self-occlusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207