MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547015029 · doi:10.2138/am-2016-nmn1011121

New Mineral NamesGeschieberite and SvornostiteImayoshiitePalladosilicidePlášiliteRaisaiteShchurovskyite and dmisokoloviteVanackerite

2016· article· en· W2547015029 on OpenAlexaff
Dmitry I. Belakovskiy, Olivier Charles Gagné, Yulia Uvarova

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralSupergene (geology)GeochemistryHydrothermal circulationUranylMineralogyGeologyChemistryPyriteUraniumWeatheringMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This New Mineral Names has entries for 9 new mineral species, including dmisokolovite, geschieberite, imayoshiite, palladosilicide, plasilite, raisaite, shchurovskyite, svornostite, and vanackerite. # Geschieberite* and Svornostite* {#article-title-2} J. Plasil, J. Hlousek, A.V. Kasatkin, R. Skoda, M. Novak and J. Cejka (2015) Geschieberite, K2(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)2, a new uranyl sulfate mineral from Jachymov. Mineralogical Magazine, 79(1), 205–216. J. Plasil, J. Hlousek, A.V. Kasatkin, M. Novak, J. Cejka and L. Lapcak (2015) Svornostite, K2Mg[(UO2)(SO4)2]2·8H2O, a new uranyl sulfate mineral from Jachymov, Czech Republic. Journal of Geosciences, 60, 113–121. Two new uranyl sulfates, geschieberite (IMA 2014-006), ideally K2(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)2 and svornostite (IMA 2014-078), ideally K2Mg[(UO2)(SO4)2]2·(H2O)8 were recently discovered in the Geschieber vein at the Svornost mine, Jachymov (Joachimsthal), Western Bohemia, Czech Republic, and named for their type locality. The Jachymov ore district is a classic example of the Variscan hydrothermal vein type of deposit, so-called five-element formation, Ag–Bi–Co–Ni–U. Both new minerals are the supergene products of the post mining alteration of the uraninite and sulfides of the primary ore. They occur in the close association with each another and with adolfpateraite, gypsum and mathesiusite. Both minerals exhibit strong yellowish green fluorescence under both short- and long-wave UV radiation. Both are brittle, have an uneven fracture, and estimated Mohs hardness of ~2. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207