MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547046242

PROPUESTA PARA LA PRODUCCIÓN DE PROYECTOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA/ PROPOSAL FOR PRODUCING RESEARCH PROJECTS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION

2014· article· es· W2547046242 on OpenAlexaff
Lc.Elvia García Ruiz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Edu-Física · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports and Physical Education Studies
Canadian institutionsSafe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPedagogyPhysical educationSociologyScientific educationPsychologyPhilosophyMathematics education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo es una propuesta para la construccion de la investigacion cientifica en la educacion fisica. Es una propuesta para la produccion de proyectos de investigacion en Educacion Fisica y se desarrolla de la siguiente forma: primeramente se considera la propuesta que establece el plan de estudios vigente (2002), su proposito, perfil de egreso y los criterios y orientaciones para la organizacion de las actividades academicas.En la construccion de proyectos y acercamiento a la investigacion se integra lo que es la comunidad de aprendizaje y practica reflexiva.Se define lo que es la competencia y como se consideran en educacion superior. Posteriormente se indican los proyectos como propuesta para generar investigacion en educacion fisica: ·       Aprendizajes por medio de proyectos.·       El trabajo por proyectos.·       Aprender en la escuela a traves de proyectos.·       Proyectos formativos. Se concluye con la Educacion fisica, investigacion cientifica y nuevos enfoques pedagogicos. La investigacion de la educacion fisica es una prioridad en nuestra practica pedagogica contemporanea. Existen problematicas sociales (sedentarismo, bullyng, obesidad…) que pueden solucionarse con propuestas de investigacion que se desarrollen desde la educacion fisica. El proposito de este trabajo es la produccion de proyectos de investigacion en educacion fisica generados por alumnos/as de la Escuela Superior de Educacion Fisica, es una propuesta en construccion. Palabras clave: Competencia, Proyecto, Investigacion, Praxiologia Motriz.   Abstract This paper is a proposal for the construction of scientific research in physical education. It is a proposal for the production of research projects in Physical Education and is developed as follows: first we consider the proposal sets the current syllabus (2002), its purpose, graduate profile and the criteria and guidelines for organization of academic activities. In building projects and approach to research integrates what is the community of learning and reflective practice.It defines what is the competition and are considered as higher education. Later as proposed projects are shown to generate research in physical education: • Learning through projects. • The work to projects. • Learning in the school through projects. • Training projects. It concludes with physical education, scientific research and new pedagogical approaches. The investigation of physical education is a priority in our contemporary educational practice. There are social issues (sedentary, bullying, obesity ...) that can be solved with research proposals that are developed through physical education. The purpose of this work is the production of research projects in physical education generated by alumni / ae of the College of Physical Education, a proposal is under construction. Keywords: Competition, Project, Research, Motor Praxiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.077
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0770.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0050.013
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Edu-FísicaSame topicSports and Physical Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207