Piezoelectric interaction in controlling the effective electron temperature and the non-ohmic mobility characteristics in GaN and other III–V compounds at low lattice temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a compound semiconductor that lacks inversion symmetry, the free electrons interact simultaneously with the piezoelectric and acoustic phonons. This combined interaction principally controls the electrical transport at low lattice temperatures. Again, at low temperatures, the electrons in some of the compounds may be significantly perturbed for comparatively low fields, say, even for a fraction of a Vcm −1 or so, which effectively seems to be high enough, and the material exhibits electrical nonlinearity. Such a perturbed ensemble then attains a field dependent effective electron temperature T e , which exceeds the lattice temperature T L . The relative importance of the piezoelectric interaction in controlling the field dependence of the effective electron temperature, and therefrom, the non-ohmic mobility characteristics have been analyzed here under the condition of low lattice temperature. The numerical results obtained for InSb, InAs, and GaN are studied in detail. When compared with the experiments, the results here seem to give the same qualitative picture with respect to the variation of the non-ohmic mobility with the electric field for the indium compounds. The results, being interesting, stimulate further work in the same field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".