MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547076548 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726836

A low power Dirac basis compressed sensing framework for EEG using a Meyer wavelet function dictionary

2016· article· en· W2547076548 on OpenAlexaff
Hesham Mahrous, Rabab Ward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyWaveletCompressed sensingBasis (linear algebra)Wavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceFunction (biology)Speech recognitionMathematicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy required for Electroencephalography (EEG) transmission at the sensor node, in Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs), is high relative to the sensor's battery size. The power consumption is dominated by sensing, processing and data transmission of the EEG. Many successful solutions based on Compressed Sensing (CS) and other techniques have been proposed. The transmission of a lower number of bits elongates the battery life of the sensor but results in high errors in the reconstructed signals at the receiver side. In this paper, we use CS to reduce the energy at the sensor. We also acquire the signal using a random sampling circuit (simulating a Dirac sensing matrix) which eliminates the use of a microcontroller at the sensor node. At the receiver end, we propose to recover the signal using a basis dictionary, which has a multiple band-pass Meyer wavelet. This is shown to result in low signal recovery error. The proposed dictionary promotes optimal sparse basis and optimal incoherence with the Dirac sensing Matrix. The proposed technique is shown to achieve low decompression errors at high compression rates such as 10:1. It also achieves ultra-low power consumption as the Meyer wavelet is incoherent with the random Dirac basis used for sampling. We show an analysis that indicates significant power consumption reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207