MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547245517 · doi:10.1109/gem.2015.7377214

Swarm modulation: An algorithm for real-time spectral transformation

2015· article· en· W2547245517 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Janzen, Steve Mann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSwarm behaviourModulation (music)Frequency modulationRadarAcousticsComputer visionSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceBandwidth (computing)PhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel class of modulation is introduced, for frequency transformation and spectral synthesis in real-time. Swarm modulation has potential applications to enhance human hearing with extended frequency ranges, in medical diagnostics for electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG) and other medical signals, for RADAR analysis, for user-interface sonification, and for sound synthesis or non-synthetic sound transformation. Swarm modulation is a new way to transform signals, and is demonstrated for transforming subsonic and ultrasonic sound into the audible range of human hearing. Swarm modulation is based on the principle of phase-incoherent frequency-roaming oscillation. Features in the frequency-time plane are reconstructed via a time-varying process, controllable with instantaneous zero-latency reaction time to new information. Swarm modulation allows prioritization of salient output spectral features for efficient processing, and overcomes cyclic beating patterns when Fourier and wavelet-based methods are applied in a stationary manner. Swarm modulation can flexibly re-map sound when a user expressively touches physical matter creating vibration. By detecting subsonic, sonic and ultrasonic vibrations, we can add to materials a rich acoustic user-feedback that can be adjusted to sound like a bell, xylophone, dull piece of wood, or a variety of other objects, in real-time. By dynamically controlling the output sound spectrum depending on the input spectrum, simultaneously with a continuous and low-latency temporal response, the system imitates the physicality of touching a real object. Applied in control panels and expressive control surfaces, swarm modulation can create realistic sonic feedback, for human head-up operation of controls in critical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207