Collecting Empirically Derived SAR Characteristic Values over One Year of Sea Ice Environments for Use in Data Assimilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new tool has been developed to calculate dynamic, state-specific tie points, to aid in the assimilation of various types of satellite data into Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Regional Ice Ocean Prediction System. These tie points are referred to as characteristic values (CVs). In this study, CVs are calculated for RadarSat-2 ScanSAR-Wide-A HH-HV backscatter data from October 2010 to September 2011. In this collection, the mean, standard deviation, and percentile distribution of backscatter at locations and times identified as being either ice or open water are represented over different relevant categories affecting the signal. The resulting water CVs are compared with modeled backscatter values, and are in close agreement at midrange wind speeds (5–14 m s−1), where wind slicks are not present. When compared against previously reported values, the ice CVs correspond best for ice conditions with fairly uniform backscatter distributions, such as the Arctic during the spring. When the ice and water CVs are compared to each other, the best cases for the assimilation of RadarSat-2 data are evident. In these cases, the CV distributions at a given incidence angle and wind speed are well separated from each other, such as in the far range (40°–50°) at midrange wind speeds. This set of CVs will be used for an initial assimilation of binary ice and open water retrievals. Future work will include a more complex treatment of ice CVs to address mixed ice types, and the application of CVs to other types of satellite data, including those from passive microwave sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".