MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547384253 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.7.7

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Romiplostim in Children with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

2015· article· en· W2547384253 on OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Tarantino, James B. Bussel, Victor S. Blanchette, Jenny M. Despotovic, Carolyn M. Bennett, Ashok Raj, Bronwyn Williams, Donald Beam, Jaime Morales, Melissa J. Rose, Nancy Carpenter, Kun Nie, Melissa Eisen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomiplostimMedicinePlaceboPlateletInternal medicineClinical endpointRandomized controlled trialAdverse effectEltrombopagThrombopoietinSurgeryImmune thrombocytopeniaGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 20% of children diagnosed with ITP have chronic thrombocytopenia, some requiring immunosuppressive treatments. The TPO receptor agonist romiplostim could be a treatment option for symptomatic children with ITP. Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind study, children with ITP for ≥6 months were randomized to weekly romiplostim or placebo (2:1) for 24 weeks, with the dose adjusted weekly from 1-10 μg/kg to target platelet counts of 50-200×109/L. Platelet response was defined as platelet counts ≥50×109/L any week of weeks 2-25 (excluding 4 weeks after rescue medication use). The 1° endpoint, durable platelet response, was defined as ≥6 weekly platelet responses during the final 8 weeks, weeks 18-25. Overall platelet response was defined as ≥4 weekly platelet responses during weeks 2-25. Antibodies to romiplostim or TPO were assayed at baseline and weeks 12 and 25. The Kid's ITP Tool (KIT), in which higher scores reflect improved quality of life, was administered to children and their parents. Results: Patients (n = 62) had median (range) age 9.5 (3-17) years, ITP duration 2.1 (0.5-10.7) years, and baseline platelet counts 18 (1-94) × 109/L; 44% were male. Sixty-six percent of patients were Caucasian, 13% African American, 8% Asian, and 15% other. For the 1° endpoint, measured in the final 8 weeks after 16 weeks of dose titration, rates of durable platelet response were romiplostim: 52% and placebo: 10% (p < 0.002) (Table). Rates of overall platelet response were romiplostim: 71% and placebo: 20% (p = 0.0002), and rates of any platelet response were romiplostim: 81% and placebo: 55% (ad hoc p = 0.03). For romiplostim, the median (range) time to firstplatelet response was 4.5 (1-20) weeks and the median average weekly dose was 3.9 (0.9-8.1) μg/kg. Median platelet counts with romiplostim were ≥50×109/L from week 8 on (Figure). In the final 8 weeks, non-cutaneous bleeding rates were romiplostim: 33% and placebo: 47%, and rescue medication use rates were romiplostim: 24% and placebo: 30%. Over the course of the study, the rates of grade ≥3 bleeding were romiplostim: 5% and placebo: 11%; rates of any bleeding and non-cutaneous bleeding were similar for romiplostim and placebo. We also examined a composite bleeding episode endpoint, defined as clinically significant bleeding, ie, CTCAE grade ≥2, OR the use of rescue medication to prevent such bleeding. The rate for these episodes for weeks 2-25 was less with romiplostim than placebo (8.1 vs 18.4 per 100 patient-weeks, p<0.0001). No patients withdrew due to adverse events (AE). Rates of serious AEs (SAEs) were romiplostim: 23.8% (10 patients) and placebo: 5.3% (1 patient). SAEs with romiplostim consisted of 2 cases each of contusion, epistaxis, and headache, and 1 case each of petechiae, thrombocytosis, nephrotic syndrome, nausea, vomiting, bronchiolitis, fever, urinary tract infection, and seizure. These SAEs often occurred with related comorbidities. Only the headache and thrombocytosis SAEs, which occurred in the same patient, were considered treatment-related by the investigator. There were no thrombotic events, no malignancies observed, and no findings indicating bone marrow dysplasia or fibrosis in the only bone marrow biopsy performed. None of the 42 romiplostim-treated patients developed neutralizing antibodies to either romiplostim or TPO. The parent impact score of the KIT showed significant quality-of-life improvement with romiplostim (p = 0.04) in the mixed-effects repeated measures analysis using a general linear model. Conclusions: In children with symptomatic ITP of ≥6 months duration, romiplostim was effective in inducing high rates of durable and overall platelet responses. There were no new safety signals. By the final 8 weeks of the study, noncutaneous bleeding was decreased with romiplostim. Romiplostim may be a viable treatment option for children with symptomatic chronic ITP. Table. Placebo (N = 20) Romiplostim (N = 42) Durable platelet response, x/n (%), all patients 2/20 (10%) 22/42 (52%) P < 0.002 By baseline age · 1 to <6 years 1/4 (25%) 3/8 (38%) · 6 to <12 years 1/9 (11%) 10/18 (56%) · 12 to <18 years 0/7 (0%) 9/16 (56%) Overall platelet response, x/n (%), all patients 4/20 (20%) 30/42 (71%) P = 0.0002 By baseline age · 1 to <6 years 2/4 (50%) 5/8 (63%) · 6 to <12 years 1/9 (11%) 15/18 (83%) · 12 to <18 years 1/7 (14%) 10/16 (63%) Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Tarantino: Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BPL: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cangene: Research Funding; UptoDate, Inc.: Patents & Royalties: royalties; Amgen, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Romiplostim is indicated for use in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. The use of romiplostim in children with ITP is investigational.. Bussel:Amgen, Cangene, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Genzyme, IgG of America, Immunomedics, Ligand, Eisai, Shionogi and Sysmex: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Amgen, GSK, Ligand, Shionogi, and Eisai: Other: Advisory board. Blanchette:Baxter Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer: Honoraria; Baxter Corporation, Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; Baxter Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer; Data Safety Monitoring Board Baxter Corporation, Octapharma: Other: Advisory board; Baxter Corporation, Octapharma: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Morales:CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Other: Stockholder. Nie:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Other: Stockholder. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Other: Stockholder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207