Características descriptivas de la raíz de wereke (Ibervillea sonorae Greene) y generalidades bioquímicas de su extracto acuoso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon. Facultad de Agronomia. Francisco Villa S/N, Col. Ex-Hacienda El Canada. CP. 66050. General Escobedo, Nuevo Leon. Mexico. 2 Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas. Instituto de Ecologia Aplicada. Division del Golfo No. 356. Colonia Libertad. CP. 87019. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Address Correspondence to: Jorge Ariel Torres-Castillo, e-mail: jorgearieltorres@hotmail.com Recibido / Received 1.III.2014. Aceptado / Accepted 31.VIII.2014. Resumen. En el presente trabajo se determino la descripcion general de un extracto acuoso obtenido de la raiz de Ibervillea sonorae; ademas, se incluyo una descripcion histologica de la misma raiz. Un analisis bromatologico general efectuado indico que la raiz posee valores nutrimentales similares a los reportados para raices tuberosas comestibles incluyendo al camote, yuca, jicama y arracacha. Por primera vez en la raiz de wereke se reporto la presencia de una proteasa activa a pH alcalino y la actividad inhibitoria de tripsina. A esta raiz se le han atribuido numerosas propiedades medicinales y bioactivas. No obstante, se requieren estudios mas profundos para determinar las moleculas responsables y sus mecanismos de accion. Este trabajo contribuyo al conocimiento de algunos aspectos bioquimicos de la raiz de wereke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".