MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

2014 Canadian Stroke Congress Abstracts

2014· article· en· W2548176147 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: For ischemic stroke, CT Perfusion (CTP) may change thrombolytic/endovascular treatment decisions when compared to NCCT/CTA alone.Two distinct thresholds may be useful in this regard: separation of 1) non-salvageable tissue (infarct core) from salvageable electrically silent tissue (penumbra), and 2) penumbra from benign oligemia (hypoperfused, but will survive if clot persists).Methods: CTP (120s,8cm) was performed on 180 patients within 12hrs of ischemic stroke.Two patient cohorts were analyzed: (1) recanalization (TICI 2b,3) <90mins post CTP and (2) persistent occlusion at 24hrs.Followup DWI occurred between 8-48hrs.CTP 4D-GE Healthcare was used to calculate cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), Tmax maps.DWI hyper-intensity on follow-up was 3D-registered to admission CTP maps.For group (1) CBF, CBV, and Tmax values were obtained from within this region, and a peri-infarct region with Tmax>6s.For group (2) CBF, CBV, and Tmax values were obtained from within the final infarct region, and total ipsilateral hemisphere, excluding infarction.CBF, CBV and Tmax were used in univariate regression models.Results: For group (1)[n=11], mean time from CTP to recanalization was 60±19min.CBF parameter (thresholds for gray and white matter 7.2 and 5.2 ml•min-1•(100g)-1) had the highest sensitivity (90.9%) and specificity (81.8%) for infarction.For group (2)[n=15], the Tmax parameter (thresholds for gray and white matter 11.3s and 11.8s) had the highest sensitivity (86.6%) and specificity (80.0%) for penumbra.Conclusion: Knowing the status of recanalization within 90mins of CTP allows for accurate delineation of infarct core, as infarct expansion will be limited.Absolute CBF gray and white matter thresholds were highly sensitive to define tissue that will be non-salvageable very soon(mins).In patients with persistent occlusion, complete infarct expansion allows for delineation of penumbra and benign oligemia.An absolute Tmax threshold is most accurate for volume of tissue that will die if the clot is not removed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4670.298

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→