MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548301284 · doi:10.1109/icelmach.2016.7732589

Torque ripple modeling and minimization for PMSM drives with consideration of magnet temperature variation

2016· article· en· W2548301284 on OpenAlexaff
Guodong Feng, Chunyan Lai, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetControl theory (sociology)Torque rippleHarmonicsTorqueStatorRippleHarmonicDirect torque controlHarmonic analysisStall torqueComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringElectronic engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spatial harmonic of magnet flux is a major cause of torque ripple in permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs), and it is temperature-dependent. Thus, this paper investigates torque ripple modeling and minimization for PMSMs considering magnet temperature variations. Firstly, experimental studies are conducted to demonstrate that the torque ripple is magnet temperature dependent. Then, based on extensive experimental tests, a novel linear model is proposed to model the relationship between the dc and harmonic components of magnet flux in the dq reference frame, which provides a way to estimate the magnet flux harmonic. Based on this model, the torque ripple model considering magnet temperature variation is proposed and validated with simulations. Afterwards, a novel adaptive current optimization approach is proposed for torque ripple minimization, which consists of two parts: the magnet flux harmonics estimation using the proposed linear magnet flux model, and the current optimization using the proposed torque ripple model. In our approach, the stator current is adaptively optimized with respect to the magnet temperature. However, the proposed approach is not necessary to run in real-time, because temperature variation has a large time constant. Our approach is validated through both numerical and experimental studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207