Safety and effectiveness of the surfing technique to cross septal collateral channels during retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Septal surfing and distal tip injections are two techniques used for septal crossing in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The aim of this study was to examine for the first time the safety and feasibility of the septal surfing technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 470 consecutive CTO PCIs performed in the Quebec hybrid CTO PCI program between January 2010 and December 2015, 240 (51%) involved a retrograde attempt. In the septal crossing subgroup, we evaluated whether the Werner collateral channel (CC) classification, CTO location, tortuosity, and number of large septal CCs influenced retrograde crossing success, time, and perforation. Septal channels were used in the majority (n=152, 63%) of cases. Patients in the septal subgroup were younger, had less bypass surgery, were more likely to have RCA CTO and had previous failure. Septal channels were successfully crossed with the wire using the surfing technique in 81%, irrespective of the CC size. Septal crossing success and time were not influenced by Werner CC class but by septal CC tortuosity. One quarter of cases had septal perforations; all were minor and asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Septal surfing is a safe and highly successful technique for crossing septal CCs when a retrograde approach is mandated for CTO PCI. The Werner class does not affect retrograde CC crossing success or time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".