MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

MLN9708, a Novel, Investigational Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: Results of a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study

2011· article· en· W2548695469 on OpenAlexaff
Sarit Assouline, Julie Chang, Robert M. Rifkin, Ai‐Min Hui, Deborah Berg, Neeraj Gupta, Yingmei Xi, Alessandra Di Bacco, Peter Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBortezomibProteasome inhibitorPharmacokineticsPharmacologyPharmacodynamicsInternal medicineAdverse effectCmaxPhases of clinical researchNauseaGastroenterologySurgeryToxicityMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2672 Background: MLN9708 is an investigational, potent, reversible, and specific 20S proteasome inhibitor. It is immediately hydrolyzed in vivo to MLN2238, the biologically active dipeptidyl leucine boronic acid. In preclinical studies, MLN2238 showed faster proteasome dissociation and greater tissue penetration than bortezomib. In OCI-Ly10 and PHTX22L mouse models of lymphoma, prolonged tumor proteasome inhibition and enhanced antitumor activity was seen with MLN2238 compared with bortezomib. Both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations are in clinical development. Here we report data from the first phase 1 study of IV MLN9708 in patients with lymphoma (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00893464). Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of MLN9708. Other objectives included characterization of the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profile, and assessment of antitumor activity and tumor biomarkers. Adults with lymphoma who had failed at least 2 chemotherapeutic regimens received IV MLN9708 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles for up to 12 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patients had ECOG PS 0–2, adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function, and no grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy. One patient was enrolled at the starting dose of 0.125 mg/m2; dose doubling proceeded with 1 patient at each dose level up to 1.0 mg/m2. Dose escalation then proceeded in ≤40% increments via a standard 3+3 scheme based on DLT occurrence in cycle 1. The MTD was defined as the highest dose resulting in DLT during cycle 1 in 0/3 or 1/6 patients. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points after dosing on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 for PK/PD analysis. PK and PD parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin v5.3). Archived tumor specimens were used for biomarker analysis. Response was assessed using International Working Group criteria for lymphoma. Results: At data cut-off (July 8, 2011), 17 patients had been enrolled and treated: 1 each at 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/m2, 4 at 1.4 mg/m2, 7 at 1.76 mg/m2, and 2 at 2.34 mg/m2. The median age was 53 years (range 23–78). Histologies were follicular lymphoma (n=6), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=3), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3), T-cell lymphoma (n=3), and other (n=2). The median number of prior therapies was 5, including radiation and stem cell transplant in 29% of patients each; 47% had received ≥6. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1–16); treatment is ongoing in 3 patients. Two DLTs were seen (1.76 mg/m2, grade 4 neutropenia; 2.34 mg/m2, grade 3 neutropenia delaying cycle 2 by >1 week); the MTD has not yet been reached. Drug-related AEs included fatigue (n=8), diarrhea (n=5), nausea (n=5) and vomiting, pyrexia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and headache (n=4 each). Drug-related peripheral neuropathy was reported in 3 patients (one grade 1, two grade 2 in patients with peripheral neuropathy at baseline). Grade ≥3 drug-related AEs were seen in 8 patients, including neutropenia (n=4) and thrombocytopenia (n=3). Two patients treated at 1.4 mg/m2 had SAEs (grade 3 increased creatinine, grade 2 pyrexia). There were no on-study deaths. One patient treated at 2.34 mg/m2 discontinued due to drug-related grade 3 neutropenia. Three patients treated at 1.76 mg/m2 required dose reductions. Of 16 response-evaluable patients, 3 achieved partial response and continue to respond (2/6 with follicular lymphoma at 1.4 and 1.76 mg/m2, 1/3 with T-cell lymphoma at 2.34 mg/m2); duration of response is >9 months in a patient with follicular lymphoma. Stable disease, durable for up to 3.7 months, occurred in 4 patients. MLN2238 plasma concentration decreased by 90% within 4 hours post dose. After multiple dosing, the terminal half-life ranged from 4–8 days. Plasma exposure appeared to increase proportionally with increasing dose from 0.5–2.34 mg/m2. Whole blood 20S proteasome inhibition was immediate, and maximal inhibition correlated with maximum plasma concentration. Conclusions: These data suggest that once-weekly MLN9708 is generally well tolerated and has early signs of clinical activity in some patients with heavily treated lymphoma. Dose escalation continues to determine the MTD; a total of 16 patients will be evaluated at the MTD. Updated data and analyses of patient stratification biomarkers will be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of investigational agent MLN9708 for the treatment of relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Rifkin:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hui:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Berg:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Gupta:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Xi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Di Bacco:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Martin:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→