Real‐time electromagnetic seed drop detection for permanent implants brachytherapy: Technology overview and performance assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the principles and report on the performance of a novel real-time electromagnetic (EM) seed drop detection technology for permanent implants brachytherapy procedures. METHODS: A novel EM hollow needle prototype was recently developed by Philips. It possesses standard 3D tracking capability as well as a seed drop detection mechanism, both performed from a single custom built EM sensor. The detection mechanism is based on the magnetic permeability changes in the sensor as the seeds pass through. Drop position estimates are generated by the tracking information at the dropping instants. Three validation experiments were carried out in this study. First, the robustness of the detection mechanism was tested in free air with four different seed types. Detection waveforms were measured and commented. The accuracy of the seed drop position estimates was then evaluated using both 2D and 3D experiments. The procedures consisted of dropping seeds in phantoms, recording the drop position estimates, and finally registering the resulting spatial distributions on reference ones obtained by accurate modalities. Seeds were dropped on a specially designed plastic support adapted to brachytherapy template dimensions for 2D experiments, and true seed positions (reference distribution) were obtained by optical detection. In 3D experiments, seeds were dropped in edible gelatin and reference distributions were obtained by localizing the implants from CT scans of the phantoms. RESULTS: All four seed types were correctly detected by the needle prototype. In total, 250 seeds were dropped on the plastic support, and 96 were dropped in gelatin phantoms. The detection rate was 100% in both cases. The minimum, maximum, and average drop position errors were, respectively, 0.1(+1.6/ - 0.1), 2.9(+1.4/ - 1.5), and 0.9(+1.4/ - 0.7) mm for 2D, and 0.1(+1.0/ - 0.1), 2.1(+1.1/ - 0.8), and 0.6(+1.2/ - 0.5) mm for 3D experiments. CONCLUSIONS: The hollow needle prototype combines both EM tracking and automatic seed drop detection in a compact and convenient form. The EM detection mechanism is robust, and the seed drop position estimates appear sufficiently accurate for potential integration of the technology to current brachytherapy treatment planning systems. In that context, it would serve as a valuable tool for rapid dosimetry validation in real-time treatment delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".