MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548941087 · doi:10.60082/0829-3929.1057

Women's Voices Being Heard: Responsive Lawyering

2001· article· en· W2548941087 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Susan McDonald, Pamela Cross

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Law and Social Policy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RIgSUMELa formation des immigrantes ayant 6t6 victimes de violence familiale pr~sente de nombreuses difficultrs.Dans cet article, l'auteur soutient que l'exercice du droit en mati~re de pauvret6 devrait mieux tenir compte des besoins de formation des immigrantes hispanophones victimes de violence en milieu familial, cornme de ceux de tous les clients d'ailleurs.La collaboration de la population avec les 6tablissements d'enseignement est utile et peut s'av~rer favorable A cette cause.L'article drcrit k. cet 6gard une initiative de recherche f6ministe ayant nrcessit6 la participation d'immigrantes hispanophones de Toronto qui ont drji subi la violence familiale.Le contexte de la recherche et la m6thode employee, de m~me que les rrsultats obtenus et les mesures qui ont 6t6 prises en rrponse A ceux-ci font l'objet de la premiere partie.Dans un deuxi~me temps, on congoit A partir de l'issue de la recherche un nouveau module d'exercice du droit de la pauvret6 ax6 sur le client.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0140.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Law and Social PolicySame topicLegal Education and Practice InnovationsFrench-language works237,207