MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B052: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist GW501516 enhances the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy

2016· article· en· W2548964503 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel D. Saibil, Michael St. Paul, Pamela Ohahsi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD8BiologyCarnitineT cellCancer researchAgonistReceptorPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaCell biologyTranscription factorNuclear receptorImmunologyImmune systemEndocrinologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has demonstrated tremendous promise for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Emerging evidence has indicated that memory CD8+ T cells (Tcm) are superior mediators of ACT than are effector CD8+ T cells (Teff) due to a superior ability to persist in vivo. Underpinning the survival advantage of Tcm is a shift in cellular metabolism away from aerobic glycolysis to instead favor fatty acid oxidation (FAO). This switch to FAO in Tcm requires the expression of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1a (CPT1a), the rate-limiting enzyme of FAO. Here, we investigated the impact of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)δ/β agonist GW501516 (GW), an agent known to boost CPT1a expression and promote FAO in other tissues, on CD8+ T cell metabolism, function and performance in the murine B16-GP33 melanoma model. Via the activation of both PPARα and PPARδ/β we found that GW treatment increased CPT1a expression in activated CD8+ T cells. Using a metabolomics approach, we demonstrated that GW treatment increased the abundance of multiple different acylcarnitines, consistent with enhanced FAO. Unexpectedly, we also found that T cells activated in the presence of GW as well as inflammatory signals, either LPS-matured dendritic cells (DCs) or IL-12, demonstrated enhanced production of interferon-γ. This increase in interferon-γ correlated with increased expression of the transcription factor T-bet. Despite the high T-bet expression, a characteristic of short-lived effector cells, GW-treated CD8+ T cells activated by LPS-treated DCs demonstrated an enhanced ability to persist in vivo. They also demonstrated improved performance in our murine model of ACT. Thus, our data indicates that combined treatment of CD8+ T cells with GW and inflammatory signals can result in in Teff cell with improved ability to produce cytokines but that have also shifted their metabolism to increase FAO akin to Tcm, allowing for enhanced in vivo persistence. These data identify GW501516, and potentially other combined PPARα and PPARδ/β agonists currently being developed, as attractive candidates for further studies and rapid translation into clinical trials of ACT. Citation Format: Samuel Saibil, Michael St. Paul, Pamela Ohahsi. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist GW501516 enhances the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B052.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207