MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549132943 · doi:10.1089/eco.2016.0022

An Introduction to the Special Issue

2016· article· en· W2549132943 on OpenAlex
Manuel Riemer, Livia Dittmer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcopsychology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaWorld Wildlife Fund
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Political sciencePublic relationsTheory of changeMultinational corporationEnvironmental educationCommunity engagementSociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Youth have the potential to play a key role in addressing the root causes of global climate change and in promoting a more sustainable local and global society. In this special issue, a group of scholars, representatives of community organizations, and young environmental leaders share what they have learned about engaging youth in six different countries in environmental action. The issue features Youth Leading Environmental Change (YLEC), a collaborative, evidence-based, multinational, youth-focused project and research study. The six participating countries include economically developing countries in the global South that face many impacts of climate change—Bangladesh, India, and Uganda—and economically “developed” countries in the global North that significantly contribute to climate change without facing comparable impacts—Canada, Germany, and the United States. Each country hosted one YLEC case study, which was anchored within a shared environmental justice framework, derived from the application of a common theory of engagement, and tailored to the local context. The YLEC workshop series used education to promote young people's engagement in environmental action that extends beyond their own lives to touch other people, communities, and systems. YLEC's use of multiple and varied components provided a comprehensive, holistic, critical, and action-oriented pedagogical approach, delivered in a format that prioritized community, mutual trust, participation, and peer-led learning. Across the contributions to this issue, readers will learn about the theory of engagement that informed the project, the results of a longitudinal mixed-method study assessing the main impacts on participants in all six countries, and a detailed analysis of how the program components were implemented and worked in creating changes in systems thinking among participants in three select countries. Key Words: Youth—Youth engagement—Environmental action—Environmental activism—Environmentalism—International—Environmental justice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it