MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549400798 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-0660

0660 Reduced enteric methane emissions on legume versus grass irrigated pastures

2016· article· en· W2549400798 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer W. MacAdam, K. A. Beauchemin, Andrea I. Bolletta, Lance R. Pitcher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForageLotus corniculatusAgronomyLegumeGrazingTrefoilBiologyRuminantPastureBeef cattlePerennial plantAnimal scienceRumenFermentationFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Life cycle assessment that compared the cow–calf and feedlot phases of beef production in western Canada demonstrated that the greatest source of greenhouse gas emissions, in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2 eq.), was enteric methane (CH4). Furthermore, the cow–calf phase was responsible for approximately 80% of CO2 eq. Perennial legume forages contain less fiber than grasses and are, therefore, more digestible, and condensed tannins (CT) have been reported to reduce ruminant enteric methane emissions. Our objective was to measure enteric CH4 emissions of beef cows and heifers grazing irrigated pastures. We compared a grass with two nonbloating legumes, one that had CT and one that did not. Our treatments were meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehmann), CT-containing birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.), and non-CT cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.). The study was a randomized complete block design with 5 replications. The experimental unit was a 0.365-ha rotationally stocked pasture containing one forage treatment and one cow in late gestation (616 ± 8 kg; 2014) or two heifers (each 439 ± 7 kg; 2015). Following a 5- (2014) or 2-wk (2015) adjustment period, enteric methane was sampled on 4 d/wk for 5 wk on 1 (2014) or 2 (2015) reps/wk using the sulfur hexafluoride method (Johnson et al., 2007). Forage disappearance from pastures was estimated from pre- minus postgrazing herbage DM, measured using a rising plate meter calibrated for each species. This value is presented as percent of BW. The herbage of the cultivar of birdsfoot trefoil used in this study, Langille, contained 20 to 30 mg CT/g DM whereas the CT concentration of the other two pasture species was negligible. We conclude that methane emissions were reduced by approximately half for cows grazing legumes compared with grass and by approximately one-third for heifers grazing legumes compared with grass. However, there did not appear to be an effect of CT on enteric CH4 emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyFrench-language works237,207