MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549435439 · doi:10.4236/jct.2016.712087

HPV Related Retroperitoneal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Rare Presentation

2016· article· en· W2549435439 on OpenAlexaff
Anita Agrawal, Rajni Chibbar, Anahita Safavi-Naini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cancer Therapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversitySaskatchewan Health AuthorityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervixBiopsyRadiologyCervical cancerParametriumCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To describe the primary carcinoma of the retroperitoneum that was positive for human papillomavirus (HPV), a surrogate molecular marker for high-risk HPV (p16) and p53. Methods: This is a case report. Results: We report a case of 50-year-old woman with a large retroperitoneal mass (squamous cell carcinoma on histology) that was treated in September of 2014 with radical concurrent chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and pelvic radiation (4500 cGY) and additional right pelvic boost of 900 cGY. It was assumed she had FIGO stage IIIB local advanced cervical cancer. She initially presented with the right leg swelling, severe pain and difficulty in walking and was treated with antibiotics for presumed cellulitis. Several months later right leg extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was diagnosed and was started on anticoagulation. CT scan and MRI reported a large right-sided retroperitoneal mass occluding the illiac vessels and ureter. The mass had invaded into the adjacent pelvic sidewall, with destruction of the iliacus muscle and underlying iliac wing. MRI showed that the cervix and uterus were both normal. On examination cervix appeared grossly normal and cervical punch biopsy revealed HSIL only. CT-guided biopsy of the mass revealed a moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma positive for p16 and p53. Conclusion: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the retroperitoneum is a real entity that is unknown. It is unclear if primary neoplasia in the cervix was small from which a cell clone arose and migrated to the retroperitoneal space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cancer TherapySame topicColorectal and Anal CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207