Bibliographic record
Abstract
WRITING HISTORY IN EXILE * Stefan Berger and Antoon De Baets, Reflections on Exile Historiography 11 * Antoon De Baets, Plutarch’s Thesis : the Contribution of Refugee Historians to Historical Writing (1945-2015) 27 * Peter Burke, Silver Lining : on Some Intellectual Benefits of Exile 39 * Ragnar Björk, Re-Embedding the Historian : German-Language Refugee Scholars in Scandinavia, 1933-1945 49 * Joseba Agirreazkuenaga, Reinterpreting the Basque Past in Exile : Scholars, Narratives and Agendas (1936-1977) 65 * Edoardo Tortarolo, Salvemini : an Italian Historian as Political Refugee 83 * Pablo Buchbinder, Argentine Historians in Exile : Emilio Ravignani and José Luis Romero in Uruguay (1948-1954) 101 * Volodymyr Kravchenko, Ukrainian Historical Writing in Canada after the Second World War 111 * Marek Tamm, Displaced History ? A New “Regime of Historicity” among the Baltic Historians in Exile (1940s-1960s) 129 * Xin Fan, The Anger of Ping-Ti Ho : the Chinese Nationalism of a Double Exile 147 * Georg G. Iggers, An Afterword 161 * Notes on Contributors 165
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".