Assessment of water quality in main branches of Shatt Al Arab River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shatt Arab River is characterized by its large number of lateral branches. Some of these bra nches extend into the center of Basra province, Southern of Iraq. These branches include; Saraji, Khora, Ash ar, Khandek, Robat, Jubyla, and Shatt Al Turk. The extension of these branches into the center of Basra province transforms them to locations for the dispo sal of sanitary sewage and solid waste. This causes their pollution and high lights the necessity of evaluati ng their water quality. The aim of this study is to assess the present status of water quality in main branche s of Shatt Al Arab River using Canadian Water Quality Index. The assessment considers the water quality f or three uses; domestic, recreation, and aquatic li fe support. To achieve this aim, water samples were ta ken from the considered branches during high and lo w tide times. The samples were tested for determining the values of ten quality parameters; dissolved ox ygen, biochemical oxygen demand, turbidity, total dissolv ed solids, pH, ammonia, total coliform bacteria, fe cal coliform bacteria, nitrate, lead, and sulfate. The obtained values of Canadian Water Quality Index for the main branches of Shatt Al Arab River vary over the ranges (13.3-25.8), (19.3-32.1), and (13.0-27.8) fo r domestic, recreation, and aquatic life support uses . These results indicated that the water quality in main branches of Shatt Al Arab River is poor and their w ater cannot be used for domestic, recreation, or aq uatic life support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".