Conventional and fuzzy PODCs for DFIG‐based wind farms and their impact on inter‐area and torsional oscillation damping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contribution to the damping of inter‐area and torsional oscillation modes, in doubly fed induction generators (DFIG) based wind farms, by power oscillation damping controllers (PODCs) based on two conventional structures and a fuzzy control strategy is investigated in this study. In this regard, a PODC with no lead/lag compensation is designed first and then a PODC with one lead/lag block is developed using eigenvalue techniques and the application of an iterative process based on the bat optimisation algorithm (BOA). Moreover, a fuzzy PODC, based on a simple fuzzy controller and tuned with the BOA according to the system transient response under a critical perturbation, is also designed. Comparative performance of the three PODCs is evaluated on a multi‐machine power system. It is observed that all three PODCs can contribute to improving the damping of inter‐area oscillations. However, eigenvalue analysis and non‐linear time domain simulations reveal that each of them may also impact to a lesser or greater extent the shaft torsional oscillation mode damping. Their relative impact in this regard is also investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".