A unified encyclopedia of human functional DNA elements through fully automated annotation of 164 human cell types
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Semi-automated genome annotation methods such as Segway enable understanding of chromatin activity. Here we present chromatin state annotations of 164 human cell types using 1,615 genomics data sets. To produce these annotations, we developed a fully-automated annotation strategy in which we train separate unsupervised annotation models on each cell type and use a machine learning classifier to automate the state interpretation step. Using these annotations, we developed a measure of the importance of each genomic position called the “conservation-associated activity score,” which we use to aggregate information across cell types into a multi-cell type view. The aggregated conservation-associated activity score provides a measure of importance directly attributable to a specific activity in a specific set of cell types. In contrast to evolutionary conservation, this measure is not biased to detect only elements shared with related species. Using the conservation-associated activity score, we combined all our annotations into a single, cell type-agnostic encyclopedia that catalogs all human transcriptional and regulatory elements, enabling easy and intuitive interpretation of the effect of genome variants on phenotype, such as in disease-associated, evolutionarily conserved or positively selected loci. These resources, including cell type-specific annotations, encyclopedia, and a visualization server, are available at http://noble.gs.washington.edu/proj/encyclopedia . Author Summary Genome annotation algorithms are an effective class of tools for understanding the function of the genome. These algorithms take as input a set of genome-wide measurements about the activity at each base pair in a given tissue, such as where a given protein is binding or how accessible the DNA is to being read by a protein. The genome is then partitioned and each segment is assigned a label such that positions with the same label exhibit similar patterns in the input data. Such annotations are widely used for many applications, such as to understand the mechanism of impact of a given genetic variant. Here we present, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive set of genome annotations created so far, encompassing 164 human cell types and including 1,615 genomics data sets. These comprehensive annotations are made possible by a strategy that automates the previous interpretation step. Furthermore, we present several methodological innovations that make these genome annotations more useful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".