MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550191738 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1586

Assessment of Oritavancin Activity in Combination with Beta-Lactams against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

2016· article· en· W2550191738 on OpenAlexaff
Francis F. Arhin, David Lalonde Séguin, Adam Belley, Greg Moeck

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBeta-lactamVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciVancomycinGram-positive bacterial infectionsMicrobiologyAntibioticsStaphylococcus aureusBacteriaBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Optimal treatments for infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remain to be elucidated. Combinations of beta-lactams (BLs) and lipopeptides or glycopeptides exhibit synergy against VRE, as do combinations of gentamicin and BLs or glycopeptides. Because the lipoglycopeptide oritavancin (ORI) demonstrates in vitro activity against VRE, we assessed potentiation of its activity in combination with BLs against VRE. Methods. Clinical isolates of E. faecium (Efm) VanA (n = 5) and VanB (n = 5) and E. faecalis (Efa) VanA (n = 6) and VanB (n = 5) were used in checkerboard experiments of ORI and the BLs ceftaroline (CPT), meropenem (MER) or penicillin (PEN). Potentiation of ORI activity was defined as a lowering of ORI MIC by at least two doubling dilutions in the combination, relative to the MIC of ORI alone, with the constraint that the MIC of the BLs in the combination had to be ≤32 µg/mL. Time-kill kinetics (TKK) were performed following CLSI guidelines. Potentiation of ORI activity in combination with BLs in TKK was defined as a ≥2-log decrease in colony-forming units (CFU)/mL from the starting inoculum in addition to a ≥1-log decrease in CFU/mL from the most active single agent at 24 hours. Results. ORI MIC range against the VREs was 0.004–1 µg/ml. MER MIC ranges were 512–1024 µg/ml (Efm VanA), 512–1024 µg/ml (Efm VanB), 16–128 µg/ml (Efa VanA) and 64–128 µg/ml (Efa VanB). CPT MIC ranges were 256–1024 µg/ml (Efm VanA), 64–1024 µg/ml (Efm VanB), 4–128 µg/ml (Efa VanA) and 16–128 µg/ml (Efa VanB). PEN MIC ranges were 1024–2048 µg/ml (Efm VanA), 256–512 µg/ml (Efm VanB), 4–128 µg/ml (Efa VanA) and 8–16 µg/ml (Efa VanB). Of the 21 VRE isolates tested, CPT, MER and PEN potentiated ORI MICs against 11, 11 and 8 isolates, respectively (Table), with the BL MICs being ≤32 µg/ml in each combination. ORI activity was potentiated by BL against the majority of Efa VanA, Efa VanB and Efm VanA isolates. BLs did not potentiate ORI activity against Efm VanB (Table). In TKK, potentiation by ORI-BL combinations compared to single agents was observed for VRE isolates. Conclusion. MER, CPT and PEN potentiated ORI in vitro activity against VRE, with the exception of Efm VanB. Several of the VREs with high (≥256 µg/mL) BL MICs showed potentiation of ORI activity at BL MICs of ≤32 µg/mL. Disclosures. F. Arhin, The Medicines Company: Employee, Salary D. Lalonde Seguin, The Medicines Company: Consultant, Salary A. Belley, The Medicines Company: Employee, Salary G. Moeck, The Medicines Company: Employee, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207