Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article recapitulates the importance of the constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium of Vatican ii and of the liturgical reform in terms of the constitution's overall contribution to the theology of Vatican ii, especially its ecclesiology. The article also draws a brief history of the reception and application of the liturgical reform after Vatican ii in a few phases, adding to the periodization proposed by Martin Klöckener: 1964–1968 (the foundations of the liturgical reform), 1968–1974 (edition of liturgical books), 1974–1988 (the beginning of an ambivalence of the papacy about the liturgical reform of Vatican ii), 1988–2000 (signs of centralization and coming back to Latinization), 2001–2005 (Liturgiam Authenticam, 2001), and the pontificate of Benedict xvi (especially the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum, 2007). An open issue is the contribution of Francis to this history of reception of the liturgical reform. The final part of the article explores how to move beyond a certain “Vatican ii nominalism” through a renewed look at the ecclesiology of the liturgical constitution, especially in light of the pontificate of Pope Francis and of the important contributions of the liturgical reform to the theological debate in these last fifty years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".