MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550429943 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1456

A Closer Look at Urinary Tract Infection Prescribing Patterns in a Suburban Emergency Room Department

2016· article· en· W2550429943 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexander Lee, Micheal Guirguis

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentUrinary systemMedical emergencyEmergency medicineFamily medicineInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Antimicrobial stewardship has become an area of increasing concern due to the rising numbers of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the fifth highest diagnosis for emergency department (ED) visits in Canada for 2011. Patients diagnosed with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) are often inappropriately prescribed an antibiotic(s) in 80% of cases. The purpose of this investigation was to inform administration, prescribers, pharmacists and other allied health workers on the current state of antimicrobial prescribing surrounding UTIs, and to measure the impact of regular reporting on patient outcomes and appropriate antimicrobial prescribing. Methods. A retrospective chart audit of 309 admissions was conducted on patients who presented to the Strathcona Community Hospital emergency department (Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada) between July and October 2015 with UTI symptoms. The primary outcome was antibiotic prescribing concordance to current practice guidelines, which included (but not limited to): Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), Bugs & Drugs, Towards Optimized Practice (TOP), and Alberta Health Services (AHS) Drugs & Therapeutic Backgrounders (DTB). Secondary outcomes include UTI symptoms and diagnoses documented in the ED charts, antimicrobial orders, hydration status, urine investigations completed, and frequency of specific pathogens grown. Results. Overall, 97% of UTI related admissions resulted in an ordered antimicrobial. The majority of the antimicrobial prescribing in the ED was non-concordant to guidelines (63%). Patients did not receive follow-up for negative cultures, resulting in 29% of the non-concordance. Of all patients reviewed, 22% demonstrated ASB or had syndromes inconclusive of UTI. Ciprofloxacin was the most frequently ordered antimicrobial (27%). Figure 9. Cluster chart of UTI cases, concordance, and initial antimicrobials prescribed. Conclusion. Audit results have demonstrated a need to engage the ED healthcare team in an effort to improve the diagnosis and treatment of UTI. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207