Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pierre Corneille’s tragicomedy Le Cid has often been interpreted as the story of medieval Castile’s transition from feudalism to a strong monarchy, a story that clearly resonates with France’s own domestic political concerns under Louis XIII. This article focuses instead on Castile’s external political engagements in the play, and how they reflect France’s efforts to establish colonies during the seventeenth century. It is argued here that reading Le Cid alongside France’s record of colonization in North America allows the play to be understood not only as an exploration of a fraught moment in French domestic politics, but also as a reflection of the kingdom’s efforts to maintain and expand control over foreign lands. Several aspects of Le Cid — Rodrigue’s duel with Don Gomès and the events surrounding it, Castile’s conflict with the Moors, and King Don Fernand’s mostly ineffective efforts to maintain order — appear on close inspection to have implications for affairs external as much as internal, a feature of Corneille’s tragicomedy that distinguishes it from the Spanish play that inspired it. More broadly, this article shows how accounting for France’s colonization of the New World may help cast the famously insular French seventeenth century in a new and revealing light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it