MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2550867256 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-0223

0223 Dietary fiber and starch, digestive physiology, and metabolic health

2016· article· en· W2550867256 on OpenAlexaff
R. T. Zijlstra, Janelle M. Fouhse, Thava Vasanthan, Michael G. Gänzle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistant starchDigestion (alchemy)StarchFood scienceBiologySmall intestineFermentationGut floraBiochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In monogastric nutrition, analyses of fiber and starch have focused on assessing quantity. However, both have a wide range of functional properties. Fibers ranging from low to high viscous affect digesta flow and from slowly to rapidly fermentable alter production of volatile fatty acid (VFA) serving as energy for the gut or the whole body. Likewise, starches ranging from low to high amylose change from rapidly digestible in the upper gut to poorly digestible but fermentable in the lower gut, thereby changing from glucose source into VFA source. Poorly digestible or resistant starch thus basically acts as dietary fiber. Functionality of these carbohydrates for nutrition or health was studied in lab and pig models. Our hypothesis is that total extent, kinetics, and site of digestion or fermentation of starch and fiber are important for whole body energy utilization and gut health. To elucidate their effects, we developed in vitro, lab-based methodologies to describe kinetics of digestion and fermentation and linked these with in vivo models including: (1) ileal cannulation to collect digesta, (2) portal-vein catheterization to sequentially sample blood, (3) slaughter method to collect site-specific intestine tissue and digesta, and (4) indirect calorimetry. Using these models, kinetics of absorption of glucose was associated with insulin and incretin release into the portal vein, intestinal microbiota, and gene expression in intestinal tissue and microbiota. These studies confirmed that slowly digestible starch is partially degraded in the large intestine and fermented into VFA including butyrate (10-fold increase in net portal appearance), reducing insulin responses by 60% and reducing whole body energy utilization. Starch entering the distal intestine altered mRNA abundance of nutrient transporters, increased portal release of the incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and was bifidogenic in the large intestine. Extreme viscous purified fiber dampened glycemic responses and reduced digesta passage rate by 50%, thereby increasing small intestine digestion of dietary nutrients, whereas increased fiber in feed grains reduced nutrient digestibility. Fermentable fiber increased butyrate and insulin production. In whole grains with ranging content of amylose and fermentable fiber, effects of similar direction but less extreme were observed. In summary, fiber and starch characteristics influence digestive physiology and thereby gut health, metabolic health, and whole body nutrient utilization. Functional characteristics of fiber and starch should also be considered is diet formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→