Current Management of Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) is an uncommon cause of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Incessant FAT can lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. There is limited information regarding the clinical course and management of FAT. This study characterizes current management strategies for FAT in children including the prevalence of spontaneous resolution and the role of catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients with FAT managed between January 2000 and November 2010 at 10 pediatric centers. There were 249 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 7.2 (95% confidence interval, 5.8-10.4) years. Cardiomyopathy was observed in 28%. Resolution of FAT occurred in 89%, including spontaneous resolution without catheter ablation in 34%. Antiarrhythmic medications were used for initial therapy in 154 patients with control of FAT in 72%. Among first-line medications, β-blockers were the most common (53%) and effective (42%). Catheter ablation was successful in 80% of patients. FAT recurrence was less common with electroanatomic mapping compared with conventional mapping techniques (16% versus 35%; P=0.02). Patients were followed for a median of 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6) years. CONCLUSIONS: FAT is managed successfully in most children. Current approaches are variable. Many patients have control of FAT with medications; however, catheter ablation is used for most patients. Spontaneous resolution is common for young children, emphasizing the role for delayed ablation in this group. Ablation is successful for all ages. Lower recurrence occurs when electroanatomic mapping techniques are used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".