Bibliographic record
Abstract
This social reunion was not intended to be public, but was merely a private entertainment given by the Principal, Dr. Dawson, on occasion of the 25th year of his term of office ; with the view, as stated in his card of invitation, of renewing old associations, of bring- ing before the members and friends of the University the results of their labours, of encouraging new efforts and securing more complete unity and co-operation.There are however some features of it in which the members of the University who were not so fortunate as to be present and the public generally may take an interest, and which do not fall within the request made that the proceedings should not be reported.The invitations were of necessity limited to gentlemen on the lists of the University, and to a few representatives of other institutions of learning.Eight hundred and fifty cards of invitation were issued, beside those to the Graduating Class, about seventy in number.The result was that three hundred and sixty gentlemen sat down to a repast, provided by Mr. Alexander, at six long tables, filling the whole of the William Molson Hall, with the exception of a gallery prepared for ladies.The Hall had previously been decorated by the graduates and students for the Founder's Festival ; and these decorations, with some slight changes, remained, while the tables were liberally ad- orned with flowers.The guests assembled in the library, and were marshalled to the hall in order of University rank and of date of gra- duation, and when all were seated, the scene presented was one both novel and imposing.Grace having been said hy the Right Revd.Dr. Bond, the Bishop of Montreal, and sufficient time having been allowed for par- taking of the refreshments furnished, and for conversation, Dr, Dawson addressed some words of welcome to his guests.The usual toasts were then duly honoured, including that of " the Lieutenant- Governor," who responded very cordially, and addresses were delivered
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.616 | 0.202 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".