Bibliographic record
Abstract
This social reunion was not intended to be public, but was merely a private entertainment given by the Principal, Dr. Dawson, on occasion of the 25th year of his term of office ; with the view, as stated in his card of invitation, of renewing old associations, of bring- ing before the members and friends of the University the results of their labours, of encouraging new efforts and securing more complete unity and co-operation.There are however some features of it in which the members of the University who were not so fortunate as to be present and the public generally may take an interest, and which do not fall within the request made that the proceedings should not be reported.The invitations were of necessity limited to gentlemen on the lists of the University, and to a few representatives of other institutions of learning.Eight hundred and fifty cards of invitation were issued, beside those to the Graduating Class, about seventy in number.The result was that three hundred and sixty gentlemen sat down to a repast, provided by Mr. Alexander, at six long tables, filling the whole of the William Molson Hall, with the exception of a gallery prepared for ladies.The Hall had previously been decorated by the graduates and students for the Founder's Festival ; and these decorations, with some slight changes, remained, while the tables were liberally ad- orned with flowers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".